Tag Archives: President Juan Santos

By Christian Wlaschütz * Colombian President-elect Iván Duque is not losing any time fulfilling campaign promises to take steps that will derail the peace process or at least put serious obstacles in its way, which will likely drive dissident FARC guerrillas back into the country’s already troubled rural areas. Four weeks after his election and […]

via Colombia: Duque Preparing to Turn the Clock Back — AULA Blog

This post is interesting and well written. I believe that it was written from the point of view of Juan Santos supporter.

President Santos was awarded the 2016 Nobel  Peace Prize for his efforts to bring about an end to Colombia’s decades-old civil insurgency. Did he deserve the award? The international community believed he did. The real question is what did the majority of Colombians think about the deal with FARC. “Colombians overwhelmingly consider too generous to rebels responsible for atrocities committed during five decades of bloody, armed conflict.”

President Santos did the right thing; he asked Colombians to either endorse or reject the peace agreement. He took a political gamble and lost badly. Everyone wanted peace but not at any cost. In the October 2016 referendum, Colombians voted against Santos’ initiative. For political and legal reasons, President Santos could not have simply made cosmetic changes to the agreement and resubmitted it for approval in a second referendum.

In my opinion, Santos should have “gone back to the drawing board” and hammered out an agreement that would have attracted broader support. Yet, this strategy was not available for many reasons. President Santos had negotiated an agreement based on a strategy of appeasement. Most commentators believe that FARC negotiators simply “out-negotiated” the government’s team during four years of talks in picturesque Havana.

We know that the deal eventually became law. Yet, this post fails to discuss how Santos’ peace initiative became law. Knowing this fact gives the reader some context in which to consider the post’s arguments.

Colombia is going to pay a high price for a peace deal that should not have been signed. Santos ignored the advice of EU, American even South America advisers when he negotiated the agreement. Yet, these facts might not be as significant as it seems in terms of the election results.  I believe that Colombians want a change in the country’s economic priorities.

I  believe that democracy is thriving in Colombia with the election of Duque.

Will Colombia´s Election Usher in Economic Change?

Updated May 2, 2018, 6:58 PM

The results of the election are confirmed; there will be a runoff on June 17, 2018. Ivan Duque (39.7%) and Gustavo Petro (24.8 %) will face each other in round two. The winner will assume the office of the presidency.

Today, at this precise moment, the rain is coming down in New York City. It is a dreary, ugly day. I  recommend staying close to home if you have nothing urgent to do that requires a trip outside.

voting in Colombia BBC

The Colombian people vote at a polling station during Colombian parliamentary elections at Congress of Colombia in Bogota, Colombia on March 11, 2018. (Photo by Daniel Garzon Herazo/NurPhoto)

I’m going to use this perfect indoor time to prepare for my Memorial Day celebration. Not only do I (with some help from a friend) have to prepare the food that will be served, I have to think about the best way to control the political discussions and debates that will inevitably take place. Right now, Colombians in South America and those who can vote in the exterior are heading to the polls to choose a new president. It is election day in Colombia. A few of tomorrow’s guests are Colombians and they are passionate about their national politics, more so, I think, since they are living in the U.S. They will be voting in the exterior at a nearby school. My Memorial Day get-together topics of conversation might be dominated by Colombian politics. I do not need to be reminded that Memorial Day is a celebration of those who have fallen fighting for the right to free speech!

On March 11, 2018, Colombia held general congressional elections and a primary as to which candidates would be run for president. The election was dominated by political rhetorical from all sides. After the voting had concluded, it was obvious that no political party or faction had won sufficient seats in Congress to control the legislative process. Whoever would eventually win the office of the presidency would have to govern by forming alliances to have any legislative success.

Writing months before the primary election Jeronimo Rios Sierra as a guest contributor in Global Americans – Jan 19, 2018 – offered an interesting observation into the average Colombians’ voting mentality. In his article entitled Colombia and the 2018 Presidential Elections, Sierra noted that:

“…it’s noteworthy mentioning that the vast majority use the current pre-election campaign stage to assert interests and support and offer political favors to the highest bidder, given that neither ideology nor party are elements that the voters have very much in consideration when it comes to exercising their vote”

The article offers a first-rate analysis of the issues that are involved in the elections. Yet, from my conversations with my Colombian friends, both here in New York City and in Colombia, there seems to be little discussion about solutions to the country’s problems. The debates invariably center on the personalities of the presidential candidates and their connection to other politicians who once were in power. Colombia’s economic challenges are never discussed.

Economic data suggests that Colombia’s economy is beginning to heat up. Yet, this uptick in the numbers is mostly attributed to rising oil prices. If the country’s economy is to continue improving, the non-oil sector will have to contribute to increased GNP growth.

What today’s presidential candidates could not dispute is Colombia’s failure to meet its 2017 GNP growth goals. The candidates are hard-pressed to say confidently that the country will meet 2018’s projections. President Santos invested a tremendous amount of political capital and money into convincing FARC to lay down its arms and join Colombian society. Even though Colombian refused to approve his referendum for peace, President Santos used his majority in the legislature to get authorization for his peace plan. He argued that his peace plan would triple direct foreign investment into Colombia and boost GNP by 5%. I believe that the Colombian President allowed politics to guide his assessments. The promised economic benefits of the peace agreement have not materialized and probably will not any time soon, if ever.

The Venezuelan refugee crisis will continue to present challenges for Colombia. Venezuelans are fleeing their country in records numbers. The political chaos in Venezuela and the melt-down of the economy is driving residents across the border to safer havens. Colombia, which faces corruption scandals, increased cocaine production and proposed cuts in American aid, has no political or economic solution to the refugee crisis. There is no general consensus in Colombia on how the crisis should be handled. None of today’s candidates have offered a viable political response coupled with financing for their solution to the Venezuelan problem.

At one end of the political spectrum is Gustavo Petro. The leftist candidate promises, if elected, to impose a different economic model on the country. He has campaigned upon a promise of moving the country to a more agricultural base while increasing manufacturing. Land that is underutilized would be distributed to benefit the poor. His progressive tax plan would help reallocate the wealth from the rich to the poor. In typical socialist fashion, Petro offers no concrete proposals for financing his ambitious economic program.

At the other end of the political spectrum is Petro’s principal rival, Ivan Duque. He represents the right and advocates lowering taxes and while promoting big business. Unlike his leftist counterpart, Duque proposes increasing productive, not reducing it. Farming companies and not individual farmers trying to make a living would receive special attention. Duque believes that manufacturing and investing in new technologies would lead to brighter economic days. In my opinion, Colombians have clear choices in terms of the direction of the country. It is curious that economics is not often brought up when people debate the election. I believe that many Colombians’ political stance depends on the personality cult of the candidate. If elected Duque would probably encounter resistance to the enactment of his economic agenda. Clearly, his policies would lead to a reduction of political patronage and a movement of public sectors jobs into the private arena. This is a ¨no.no¨for many Colombians.

In my opinion regardless of the who is elected president the economy will pick up steam in 2018. The only drag on the economy’s forward inertia would be counter-productive policies. In simple terms; the government would have to impede the inevitable rise in oil prices, which will spur growth. The debate Colombians should be having is which candidates’ policies will not impede economic growth. I believe that the election of Petro will lead to a restriction of the economy. If I could vote, which I cannot, he would not receive my vote. Duque would and it as simple as that.

To understand politics in Colombia, you must accept the reality that good jobs are offered by the government. Political patronage at all levels rules the day. These jobs offer stability, some benefits, and a pension. Political supporters are rewarded with these “prime-time” jobs. Consequently, a change in political leadership can and often results in a transfer of jobs to the supporters of the winning party. Unfortunately, as is the case in this election, the policy positions of the candidates are secondary to the abilities to deliver jobs. I have heard heated conversations about the election in terms of family members either having or losing work opportunities.

I am sure that if the conversation at my Memorial Day party turns to the results of the election, no one will civilly discuss how the new government will (should) spur economic growth. Hopefully, the Sangria will not lessen my guest’s inhibitions and help foster outright shouting matches. This evening we will learn the results of today’s election. Depending on the general reaction to the result, I will know how to manage my Colombian guests’ passion for debating the not relevant.