President Dilma Rousseff’s No Win Situation


Brazil's President Dilma Rousseff REUTERS/Adriano Machado
Brazil’s President Dilma Rousseff REUTERS/Adriano Machado

In September 2013, President Dilma Rousseff addressed the U.N. General Assembly. She delivered a fervent criticism of the U.S.’s NSA spying program.  She scolded the U.S. for violating international law by indiscriminately spying on citizens and foreign governments. Anti-American members of the General Assembly wildly applauded her remarks. To stir up sentiment against the U.S., President Rousseff reminded the diplomats that in the 70s she served with the Brazilian guerrillas. When captured by the ruling military authorities, she was imprisoned and tortured. The diplomats understood the President’s implied David and Goliath analogy. President Rousseff went on to praise Latin America’s battle against authoritarianism and the disregard for the right to privacy. The Brazilian leader basked in her moment of fame. Those cheering Rousseff’s speech could never have imagined how her political fortunes would change over the next two years. At the time of her U.N. speech, she had to have known that the Brazilian economy was slowing down and that the Petrobras SA scandal was growing.

Like other developing countries, Brazil has its share of pressing  social issues . Countless motions pictures have been made about the country’s sprawling favelas. Visitors to the country see poverty and blight while standing in the midst of glamour and glitz. It is common for brutal crimes to occur in crowded public places while onlookers look on with indifference. Demonstrators often take to the streets to complain about the country’s much neglected public transportation infrastructure. Local Brazilian politicians demand that their leaders address these issues and not grandstand on the international stage.

Upon taking office, President Rousseff promised to continue the policies and work of her predecessor, Luiz Inacio Lula. Brazil achieved real social and economic development under Lula’s stewardship. Millions of Brazilians entered the middle class. Quality education reached millions who had previously not had access to it. Businesses appreciated former President Lula’s policy of “spreading the wealth around.” In general, Brazilians believed that better times had finally arrived. Former President Lula’s endearing charm and genuine advocacy of the developing world pushed Brazil a to the forefront of international politics. Every politician knows that good times can turn into bad times with little warning.

Many commentators and economists questioned Lula’s reliance upon governmental subsidies to finance social problems. President Rousseff was not one of the skeptics. Influential economists warned that the economy would cool off, thus hindering the government’s ability to finance the promised social changes.  Many Latin American countries turn to state-owned companies to financial social change. Unfortunately, using state-owned companies to subsidize social programs tends to sap the companies’ economic vitality and turn them into breeding grounds of corruption. Former President Lula ignored the dangers of using the country’s state-owned and run oil, company, Petrobras SA, as the government’s piggybank. Though President Rousseff graduated college with a degree in economics, she chose to disregard her education and, upon assuming the Presidency, continued to plunder Petrobras SA. to finance her socialist agenda. The scandals that have erupted around the state-owned company have paralyzed the country and dragged the economy further down. President Rousseff cannot escape the consequences of her connection to the Petrobras scandals; she served as Chairman of Petrobras SA under former President Lula. Regardless of her political connections, President Rousseff, in my opinion, lacked the experience or technical knowledge to run Petrobras SA as a real business.

According to Fortune’s (2014) Biggest Losers of the Global 500, Petrobras SA comes in at #3. The company’s debt of 125 billion is the highest among all international oil companies. Due to mismanagement, falling commodity prices and rampant corruption the company’s finances are a mess. Brazilians are waiting for someone to step up and sacrifice themselves to save Petrobras SA from itself. Most Brazilians believe that President Rousseff should be that person.

The never-ending arrests and reports of illegal activity at Petrobras SA are rattling the country to its political core. Recently, the police conducted a second mass arrest operation of those accused of corruption. A year ago police arrested 35 oil executives who had been charged with bribery, money laundering and other corruption-related charges. Newly installed Petrobras executives recently admitted that the company is facing uncertain times.

It is not difficult to imagine how the average Brazilian feels about the Petrobras SA mess; they have lost confidence in their government officials to faithfully execute the laws that they were elected to enforce. The extent of the corruption makes it impossible for President Rousseff to claim that she was not attuned to the culture of corruption at a company she chaired. I do not think she can function effectively as the country’s chief executive.

Concerning Brazil’s present-day problems, financial experts, political scientist and policy formulating economists debate how best to put the country back on track. The Petrobras scandal has caused a lack of confidence across the board. This, in turn, has led to a downturn in the economy.

Some experts argue that the economic problems that the country now face are largely independent of the Petrobras scandal.  What all agree upon is that Brazil is caught in a pincer: the economy is in a full-blown recession and the Petrobras scandal keeps growing.

Published by Paul Hunter Jones

I was raised in Great Neck, New York. In 1975 I received a B.A. degree from Alfred University. Three years later I graduated from the University of Michigan School of Law and have been practicing law in New York ever since. I am a Republican though I will vote according to the better policy or stance. Politics, law, and finance are my interests. I give special thanks to Cheryl Jones of Lexington South Carolina, my sister, and Eliana Trout Blanco of Santa Marta, Colombia, a one of the kind friend, for their contributions in the writing of this blog.

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: